Navigating Lease Modifications and Reassessments

In today’s evolving business landscape, CFOs and their teams face a myriad of challenges. Among these, are the challenges around lease accounting including lease modifications and reassessments. ASC 842 and IFRS 16 have introduced fundamental shifts in recognizing and measuring leases, and for the Office of the CFO, the spotlight is on handling lease changes effectively and ensuring transparency in financial reporting.

Lease Modifications & Reassessments: A Chief Concern

  • ASC 842: Key elements of the lease might need reassessment if there’s a notable change in circumstances. Notably, alterations in the lease term or a reassessment in the option to purchase the underlying asset demands an adjustment in the right-of-use asset and the corresponding lease liability.
  • IFRS 16: Equally, under IFRS 16, any significant event or alteration within the lessee’s control, such as early termination or extension of the lease, mandates a revision in the right-of-use asset and the lease liability.

Lease Modifications: Delving Deeper

  • ASC 842: Modifications are any shifts in the lease scope or the associated consideration that wasn’t part of the initial agreement. These are either treated as separate leases or, in certain situations, as the termination of the original lease leading to the inception of a new one.
  • IFRS 16: If the modification broadens the lease’s scope and the price adjustment aligns with the standalone cost of the added asset, it’s considered as a separate lease. Otherwise, it necessitates remeasuring the lease liability and corresponding adjustment of the right-of-use asset.

Retroactive Adjustments: Maintaining Integrity

  • The Need: These adjustments cater to errors, changes in accounting principles, or omissions in previously finalized financial statements.
  • The Caveat: With closed financial periods, direct changes can endanger the trustworthiness of financial statements. From auditing concerns to regulatory issues, altering closed periods can be risky and might lead to non-compliance.
  • The Approach: Significant errors after a closed period are typically dealt with by reporting a prior period adjustment, often restating the previous financial statements with full disclosure. Minor errors might be adjusted in the current period with appropriate disclosure.

Key Takeaway:

  • Both ASC 842 and IFRS 16 mandate meticulous monitoring of lease contracts’ adjustments.
  • While there’s a shared foundation, distinct nuances exist in how each standard approaches lease modifications and reassessments.
  • A fortified system, such as Black Owl, to pinpoint and account for these changes in compliance with these standards is imperative.

Navigating lease accounting under ASC 842 and IFRS 16 can indeed be intricate. For CFOs and Controllers striving to maintain flawless financial reporting amidst frequent lease changes, Black Owl Systems presents a game-changing solution.

YouTube video
Black Owl Lease Change

Our state-of-the-art lease change model is unparalleled in simplifying lease accounting. Thanks to its impeccable audit trails, automated computations and retroactive adjustments, the hassles of missed or delayed reassessments become history. Engage with Black Owl Systems and redefine your lease accounting precision and efficiency.

Greg Kautz
Greg Kautz

Greg Kautz, CPA, CMA

Latest Blog Posts

News & Press Releases